Menu

EAGAINST.com

In Greece, as the state collapses, the neighborhoods organize – An interview with a member of the Athenian assembly movement

syneleysi1

Libcom.org has translated (in December 2014) an interview with a participant the Greek assembly movement first published in 2013, providing details concerning the methods employed by the movement and the obstacles that it has encountered since its rise in 2008. (Here is the original in Spanish, published in the Spanish journal, Argelaga, No. 5, Fall 2014). Originally has been published in French, under the title, “L’etat s’effondre, les quartiers s’organisent”. Retour sur le mouvement des assemblées de quartier. La revue Z, No. 7, 2013. Dossier Grèce: Thessalonique dans la dépression européenne. Bricolages quotidiens et résistances insolvables.

In Greece, as the State Collapses, the Neighborhoods Organize – An Interview with a Member of the Assembly Movement

[Introductory note added by the editors of Argelaga: An interview conducted for issue no. 7 [2013] of the French journal, Z, which perfectly illustrates the process of autonomous organization of the population in the face of the decomposition and collapse of the State apparatus. The example is valid for any other European country; the difference is only one of degree. Let us recapitulate some of the difficulties that stand in the way of autonomy: the inertia of a life subject to the commodity, the habit of appealing to the State for help, egoism, the rise of fascism, police repression, weariness in the face of constant sacrifices, etc. A life of freedom is not an easy road, but a life of slavery is not easy, either.]

Where did the neighborhood assembly movement originate?

I must point out that the movement is quite varied, that it has passed through various stages and for that reason it can be described in a thousand different ways. The idea of neighborhood assemblies spread massively after December 2008. The death of Alexis and the weeks of revolt, confrontations and occupations that followed, as well as the acid attack on the transit worker, Konstantina Kuneva, were the events that really shook society. The broad characteristics of that revolt are, on the one hand, the absence of any demands or petitions for reforms and, on the other hand, the aspect of decentralization in all the neighborhoods of Athens and, immediately thereafter, in the whole country. After December 2008, the dynamic of the actions and confrontations in the city centers reached its limit and then shifted to the neighborhoods. With the assemblies, the idea at first consisted in obtaining places for meetings, without having anything particular in mind, except the will to engage in collective inquiry. It was a way to prolong the relations that had been created during the revolt. Many of the assemblies were formed at that time, but only four of them continued to function continuously. The others reappeared when the social movement broke out again, as is taking place today or as happened in 2011, when there were approximately forty assemblies in Athens.

Can you tell us about the assembly in your neighborhood?

The assembly of Vyronas, Kaisariani, Pangrati (VKP) was formed in neighborhoods that have a long history of popular revolt: one of them was the old red neighborhood during the Resistance, the neighborhood that the Nazis were never able to conquer. This tradition was interrupted with the passage of the years as a result of the bourgeoisification of the population, but also because the State built a barracks there for armed police. Today these three neighborhoods have a heterogeneous population, but in general they are rather well-off districts. There were assemblies in VKP before 2008, created amidst struggles over public space. The first one was formed to oppose the project to construct a theater in the middle of a park. Besides the paving and cement this implied—Athens is one of the cities in Europe with the fewest green spaces—the inhabitants knew that the theater would be rented to private companies that would raise the price of tickets through the roof. Thanks to this mobilization, the project was cancelled and the assembly continued to exist, and even still exists today, organizing activities for children, basketball tournaments and a free café in the park on the first Sunday of each month. It is also very active in participating in the life of the neighborhood, distributing militant propaganda in the schools, organizing open festivals with the immigrants and also engaging in solidarity actions with people who were arrested in the demonstrations during the general strikes. And there was another struggle that attracted a lot of people: the opposition to the tunnel and highway overpass project that was slated to destroy part of the Hymettus mountain, one of the last green spaces in the city, located to the east of the city center. There were many demonstrations in the vicinity of the mountain, blockades of the highway bypasses, and actions at the toll booths, which caused the project to be abandoned. In VKP the people had these experiences as a starting point. Later, during the revolts of December 2008, they occupied a municipal youth center for a few days and rapidly convoked the assembly. After the weekly assemblies in the three neighborhoods, the people decided to rent a place to meet. At this time about thirty persons participate in the assemblies, a figure that has remained more or less stable to this day.

What kind of actions are you organizing?

We are involved in two types of action: on the one hand, we are defending ourselves against the attacks of the system and, on the other hand, we are elaborating projects and ways of life that seem desirable to us. For example, in 2010 there was an initial attempt to coordinate with other assemblies and libertarian collectives that participated in the struggles in their neighborhoods against the fare increases in public transport. We arranged for each assembly to simultaneously organize demonstrations in the subway and bus stations. Pamphlets were distributed, the ticket machines were vandalized, and we proposed self-reductions in order to question the discourse of the authorities, which consisted in saying that public transport was just another commodity that had to be profitable. We made an attempt to link up with the workers in public transport, but this was difficult. The people from Golden Dawn—the Greek neo-Nazi party—have a lot of influence among the bus drivers trade union. Later, we participated in all the general strikes since 2010, which were severely repressed. During the course of one of these strikes, the pigs attacked the march of the neighborhood assemblies, sending one person to the hospital in a coma, who almost died, and others were seriously injured. These experiences brought us together and strengthened our determination. We blockaded the supermarkets and shopping centers of the neighborhood in order to turn the strike into a real strike, so that no one would be able to consume. We also attempted to encircle the Greek Parliament when the deputies were voting on the second round of austerity measures. The neighborhood assemblies played an important role in this demonstration. We also tried to maintain a permanent presence in the neighborhood, organizing demonstrations and a collective kitchen and cultivating an occupied garden for the purpose of attaining food self-sufficiency. We also hold a barter market once a month in different squares. We also have a meeting hall with a library that is open to the neighborhood, in which we organize various activities, debates and talks.

All these actions are undertaken for the purpose of breaking with the individualism and the pessimism that have seized Greece with the onset of the crisis, to fight against the social cannibalism that the State is indirectly promoting as a solution to the crisis. By way of these practices, we are attempting to encourage the development of relations based on equality and solidarity. The neighborhood is a very fertile space for this, all the more so insofar as in Athens the city districts are still socially quite mixed, which allows us to establish unexpected relations.

How do you propose to deal with the problem of food?

We had to deal with this problem ever since we opened the collective kitchens. We made contact with the other assemblies that had similar problems and, during that time, a large area in an adjacent neighborhood was occupied: a villa with cultivable land. We decided to convoke a new assembly entirely dedicated to this question. This same assembly is now responsible for cultivating the land for the purpose of supplying the collective kitchens of the four neighborhoods that are cooperating on this project. We are still a long way from being self-sufficient with regard to food, but it is a first step. Having said this, the garden is being threatened with eviction. Expulsions from the occupied spaces, such as, for example, at Villa Amalias and Skaramagas, have multiplied in Athens since the beginning of 2013.

We have heard a lot about the polarization of Greek society. Have you noticed this in your assembly?

Certain people have spoken at the assembly to express their view that there are too many immigrants in the neighborhoods and that something must be done about this. This is a risk we have to take when participating in open movements. Sometimes there are even outbursts of sexism during actions. The only way to fight against this is by talking to people. Usually, they understand, and if not, they go away. Once, however, at a neighborhood assembly convened to oppose the construction of cell phone towers, two fascists showed up without saying that they belonged to Golden Dawn. But we knew about them because in a small neighborhood everyone knows everything. The only thing we could do was to tell them that they were not welcome.

Do you have a lot of run-ins with Golden Dawn?

Since they obtained seats in Parliament, and thanks to the support they have received as a result, Golden Dawn has opened offices throughout Greece. Whenever they open a new office, protests and demonstrations are held that often result in confrontations with the police. Without police protection, the fascists would not be able to maintain a presence in the neighborhoods. Fortunately, at least for now, they only have two really active neighborhood committees in Athens. In some working class neighborhoods such as those in western Athens, near the Piraeus, they have a certain amount of influence. In those districts, however, the neighborhood assemblies openly confront them. In our neighborhood there is neither a fascist presence nor any immigrant hunting, but this is due, in part, to our presence and constant vigilance. In my opinion, the antifascist struggle consists more in building our own structures and the kind of world we want—which is basically antifascist in essence—than in denouncing them with speeches.

You mentioned the first wave of assemblies after December 2008. What other initiatives for common action have taken place in the neighborhoods?

In May 2011, following in the footsteps of the movement of the indignados and the occupation of Syntagma Square, there was a second wave of assemblies in Athens. In our neighborhood, militants from one part of the radical left called for the creation of another assembly in which we also participated. Soon, however, major differences arose among us. If you want to create a space for dialogue with people who act in a paternalistic and condescending way, like leaders, you will necessarily have conflicts. During this period the assemblies were inundated with demands such as a proposal to nationalize the Bank of Greece. People who wanted an open debate soon lost interest and this second wave did not last very long. The assemblies controlled by the leftists could not, or did not want to, propose concrete demands concerning health, education or food security. In short, they did not try to promote another way of life, beyond the capitalist system which is collapsing all around us. Do we need to nationalize the Bank? This is not the correct question, in my view. A third wave of assemblies took place when the State implemented a special extra tax on everyone’s electricity bills: “those who do not pay the tax, will have their electricity cut off”. The tax and the attempts to fight against it have accentuated the differences between the assemblies. Some of them were composed of people who were concerned about having their electricity cut off and simply asked the more politically active participants to solve the problem for them. Some accepted this role, although this implied the abandonment of horizontal organization in favor of the logic of delegation.

Our assembly also issued an appeal to organize around the issue of these special taxes. It is very dynamic and is actually quite radical: our neighborhoods do not have to undergo electricity cut-offs, whether because of non-payment of the tax or for any other reason. For us, electricity is a vital good.

The assembly went to the tax offices and forced the company that was contracted to implement the electricity cut-offs to leave the neighborhood. Later, we went to the local headquarters of the electricity company to cut off its electricity. Today, we have established neighborhood patrols to prevent the technicians from the electric company from cutting off our electricity. At the present time, along with the antifascist struggle, this is the main fight that the assemblies are waging.

Can you tell us about the movements that have influenced you?

The assembly movement owes a great deal to what took place in Argentina. Although there is no direct connection, the influence is real. During the first general strikes, we were inspired by the Argentinian experience, and later also by the Tunisian and Egyptian events. Another important influence was the self-reduction movements in Italy during the seventies: groups organized to not pay rents, electric bills or transport fares. In our assembly, particularly, many people were inspired by the Zapatista struggle in Mexico and its quest for autonomy. We participate in solidarity actions with these struggles in our neighborhood.

One factor that all these different sources of inspiration have in common, which is present in the assemblies, is the will to organize horizontally, without political parties: although there are party militants in the assemblies, they only participate in the assemblies as individuals, without labels. The political foundations of the assemblies are autonomy and the will to create structures outside capitalism, based on sharing and solidarity. In our assembly, there are basic positions that have been arrived at after long discussions. We are always seeking a consensus in order to find a way to move forward together.

In Greece, there is much less belief in institutions, in the idea of the social contract and representation, than in France. It is fertile ground both for anti-authoritarian ideas as well as for hyper-authoritarian ideas. Here, it is much easier than it is in France to associate on common bases with people from diverse political backgrounds. On the other hand, however, the danger of becoming a closed group also exists: finding a way to keep the assemblies open to recent arrivals is a never-ending task.

What is your overall assessment of the four years of existence of your assembly? And what is your assessment of the neighborhood assemblies, generally speaking?

It’s hard to say. After the revolt of 2008-2009 we were continuously trying to keep abreast of what was happening. What the neighborhood assemblies have once again contributed, as a possibility, was precisely not to restrict our demands to things that were taken away from us and instead to move towards the world we want to create. But the obstacles are numerous and the repression suffered by the political militants, the rise of Golden Dawn, the explosion of unemployment and the constant violence against immigrants prevent us from devoting ourselves to a program as if nothing else was happening.

One of the weak points of the movement is the fact that the moments of resurgence have never obtained any concrete results. The general assembly of the neighborhood assemblies was one of those moments. In November 2011 all the existing assemblies convened in one assembly: forty in Athens, with four hundred representatives and a good dynamic. But it quickly ran out of steam. It obtained no concrete victories and this was a source of discouragement, creating a feeling of defeat that is very acute at the present time. This feeling is also in part caused by the fact that the neighborhood assemblies do not appear to be viable solutions for the organization of everyday life.

The will to create structures based on self-organization and autonomy poses numerous questions: how can they be built while simultaneously going beyond the logic of charity and philanthropy? How can we create our own autonomy in an environment in which everything has been stolen, where we cannot produce anything for ourselves, especially in the urban setting? What do we have to do to get people to really participate? When we organize collective kitchens or barter markets, we have to constantly explain that they are not ordinary distribution services. I do not think there is a really convincing answer to these problems, we have to be patient. The way I see it, in the very large assemblies people are inclined to delegate tasks to others and to accept the representation of a small group, whereas when there are more personal relations and more contacts, there is correspondingly greater equality in participation. It is a question of relations. There are not many people who think that we can live without anyone’s help, without a basis of consensus and dialogue, and that we can reclaim our lives on an individual basis.

I get the impression, however, that, as the State and the economic system decline and fall, more “grey zones” will arise and other modes of organization and relations will become possible. The role of the assemblies will be crucial in this. Not only do we have to keep the home fires burning, but we also have to make the fire last longer. New structures appear in Greece with each passing month. From this perspective, the movement is on the right path.

2013

 

15 Oct – Occupy London

Between 4000 – 5000 people gathered in London’s Square Mile to voice their anger at the social and political inequality in the UK and beyond. OccupyLSX held its first General Assembly near St Paul’s, despite police refused to allow protesters onto Paternoster Square. The assembly was open to all, allowing attendees to voice their opinions as well as taking decisions. Together they decided the future of this occupation while some activists worked together to set up toilet’s kitchens. There are plans for workshops, talks and teach-ins.

Jane McIntyre who was planning to stay at Occupy LSX for as long as possible said:

 Whilst the illigitmate G20 finance ministers meeting is happening this weekend, people around the globe are protesting against the inequality and injustice that has arisen because of the failed economic system that governments are pushing onto people everywhere. People are saying enough is enough, we want a read democracy, not one that is based on the interests of big business and the banking system.

OccupyLSX supporter, Ronan McNern, said:

Our movement for change transcends political affiliation – you don’t have to be left or right. Come join as we begin to open up a space in London’s Square Mile to start much needed conversations about changes in the financial sector and government, so that they better serve and protect the interests and wellbeing of the country.

Vlad Teichberg, member of the Occupy Wall Street media collective said:

London – welcome to the revolution! What’s happening around the world with the spread of occupations is the beginning of a global conversation based on the principles of equality, unity and mutual respect about the future of our society. Let’s get together and we can all be part of this.

The Australian publisher, journalist,computer programmer, internet activist and editor in chief of WikiLeaks, Julian Assagne, was present and gave a generic support speech. He was welcomed by the majority of the protesters but, also, there was a significant number of those who disagreed with his presence, claiming that this is a genuine direct action from below.

Julian Assange speaking to the assembly

[portfolio_slideshow showtitles=true thumbs=true]

Sources: Occupy Britain, People’s Assemblies

Short URL: http://wp.me/pyR3u-8V7

Indignados in London

EN: Since the 23rd of May, a few hundreds of Spaniards who reside in London fill the square around the Spanish Embassy and organise assemblies in support of the movement of Indignados for Real Democracy in Spain. What unites them is the indignation for all that is happening in Spain and in the world, and also their desire for justice, equality and dignity.

Yesterday they invited members of the UKuncut, the People’s Assemblies and members of the Autonomy Against Barbarism political group (see video below). Later on they moved to Regent Street, which was rented by the Spanish embassy for one day for tourism promotion purposes, they distributed fliers and shouted slogans in support and solidarity with the Spanish May.

EL: Από τις 23 Μαίου, μερικές εκατοντάδες Ισπανών που κατοικούν στο Λονδίνο, μαζεύονται γύρω από την μικρή πλατεία της Ισπανικής Πρεσβείας και οργανώνουν συνελεύσεις, εκδηλώνοντας με αυτόν τον τρόπο την υποστήριξη του κινήματος των Indignados, για μια Πραγματική Δημοκρατία στην Ισπανία. Αφήνοντας στην άκρη νεκρούς διασπαστικούς τίτλους, ενώνονται ενάντια στην αδικία, την ανισότητα και την ατιμωρησία των πολιτικών.

Χθες, η συνέλευση πραγματοποιήθηκε και με την παρουσία μελών της πλατφόρμας UKuncut (κίνημα ενάντια στις περικοπές), του People’s Assemblies και της πολιτικής ομάδας του «Autonomy Against Barbarism». Αργότερα, οι συγκεντρωμένοι κινήθηκαν προς την Regent street που είχε νοικιαστεί από την Ισπανική κυβέρνηση με σκοπό την προώθηση μιας τουριστικής καμπάνιας. Εκεί και ακούστηκαν συνθήματα και μοιράστηκαν φυλλάδια προς υποστήριξη του Ισπανικού Μάη.

ES: Desde el pasado 23 de Mayo, cientos de españoles residentes en Londres, llenaron la plaza en que está situada la Embajada Española y organizaron asambleas, expresando con ello su apoyo al movimiento de los Indignados por una democracia real en España. Les une la indignación por la situación actual en España y en todo el mundo, así como su deseo de justicia, igualdad y dignidad.

Ayer, la Asamblea tuvo lugar en presencia de los miembros de la plataforma UKuncut (movimiento en contra de los recortes), del grupo «People’s Assemblies» y de la directiva de grupo «Autonomy Against Barbarism» (ver video más abajo). Más tarde, los reunidos se trasladaron a la calle Regent, que había sido alquilada por la embajada española con fines de promoción turística, para distribuir folletos y vocear consignas en apoyo al movimiento comenzado en mayo en España.

Videos:

Photos:

shadow_curl

shadow_curl

shadow_curl

Short URL: http://j.mp/lDoReB

A really joyful thing I wish I’ll do again forever- Spanish Movement

spanishrevolution 14

In case you haven’t heard (due, probably to the interesting media blackout we are suffering), here in Spain thousands of people are protesting against our worthless politicians and their connivance with the corrupt financial establishment. We’ve occupied the central squares of our cities and are having a real, joyful, extremely interesting political debate. Don’t miss it. Here’s a text on it from an anonymous Spanish citizen.

A really joyful thing I wish I’ll do again forever

How can we explain this to the same press and media who are now speaking from a distance, often disdainfully, about “these youngsters” (these youngsters who are so far away from us, so alien, so difficult to understand, so ignorant; these youngsters who have nothing to do with our daily routines, our boredom, our unrest, our petty -miserable- concerns); how can one explain to them that we are not just “the other”. How can we tell them that many of us -most of us- aren’t even young anymore. That some of us actually do have jobs and permanent contracts and even make ends meet; many of us aren’t even suffocated by mortgage payments and, still, we are camping in our city squares.  We, too, are fed up. How can we explain to them that we are all in this together: the unemployed, the precarious workers, the mortgage payers, the ones who have recently been fired and those of us who are none of the above. How can we explain -to the media and politicians, to radio and TV commentators; to all those who speak, recite or burst into soliloquies without even stopping to listen- that we are also coming to our public city squares for reasons unrelated to strictly economic or material issues. How can we explain to them that some of us are here because we know that living a precarious life does not only mean being jobless, but also being daily enslaved by our jobs, cheated by the market’s alienating and indoctrinating dynamics, stripped down of what makes us human and rendered just feeble merchandise, consumers and objects of consumption. Stripped down of what connects us to other human beings -our common joy, our empathy, our capacity to listen, to communicate, to stimulate and love each other- and left to stack for life, hermetically sealed in individual packets. Isolated.

How can we explain that we have come to fight these alienating patterns bringing out the best in ourselves. That we know that those who are responsible of creating these patterns have faces, eyes and names.  But that we also know we are the ones perpetuating and nurturing these patterns and we have come to put an end to them. We have come to short-circuit this system which we have actually been making stronger, and which is eating up our lives. How can we explain this to people who do not think this is possible.

How can we explain that we have also come to the squares to find each other. Tired of being locked up at home, vacuum-sealed in front of our TVs, tired of barely touching one another in pubs, at soccer games, tired of never really getting to know each other. We have also come out to inhabit a common space. To create, by means of our own presence, a new space in which to talk, to tell each other who we are, what we need, what we have learned so far.

So what are these youngsters proposing? This is what’s being exclaimed behind every politically orthodox rostrum, with a combination of astonishment, disdain and a bad conscience. We, the youngsters, those 17, 25, 36, 43 and 60 year-old youngsters, have come together precisely to decide what it is we want, so no one can ever again choose for us the things we do not want. We have come out to share the tools that have worked for us so far, to share the things we know, by virtue of which actions we have come to alter what is private and what is public. We have come to change everything that’s grey-colored in our lives of work, pubs and soccer. And so we are here to change the world, because the personal is still always political and anything political starts in the personal.

We have come out to find out who we are living with and we have realized that what they told us was not true. We are not different, we are not far away from each other, we are not enemies, we do not wish to steal from each other what little we have. We have found out that we are one, even if we do not share the same language or support the same soccer team. We have found out we are more generous than we thought we were. We are interested in what we are telling each other and we want to keep on talking. We do not wish to go back to our homes, our TVs, our vacuum-sealed packets. We do not wish to go back to being regulated, to being forbidden to seat at public squares and to be locked up in cities and continents. We now want to know what is being told in public squares in other countries, even outside the Schengen walls.

We have discovered that coming to these squares is bringing life to them and that bringing life to our cities, collectively, is bringing life to our own selves. We have discovered we can do it a lot better than them when we are together. And that we feel better together than alone. And so we are exultant.

How can we explain this to them, who do not feel this joy?

Barcelona
May 18, 2011

Initially published in: People’s Assemblies